Dynastar Touring Vertical Women, 2018/2019

Dynastar Touring Vertical Women 2018/19

Last winter, Dynastar touring skis were brought under one roof. Now the range has been further expanded. New for this winter, two women's models have been developed, which are aimed at classic ski tourers.

Vertical Doe

Vertical Bear W

Ski technologies

Cell & Paulownia wood core

The vertical DYNACELL and PAULOWNIA strips, developed for lightweight free touring skis, allow a featherweight core construction for the ultimate mix of ultra-light energy, shock absorption and stability. DYNACELL technology, known from aeronautics, is a gas-filled, closed PVC structure with an excellent stability-to-weight ratio for more energy, ultra-light shock absorption and stability. Paulownia wood cores are typically 25% lighter than common wood cores.

Paulownia wood core

Paulownia wood core reduces the weight of the ski by about 25%. Dynastar combines this wood with fiberglass developed by the racing department to ensure optimum ride and control.

Tip Rocker

The ski has only a moderate rocker on the shovel. The lift is moderate so that the ski maintains contact with the snow over the entire edge length. The ski turns more easily on the flat and is more tolerant in the turns.

100% Carbon Fiber (Carbon Fiber)

Carbon as a Formula 1 fiber guarantees additional stability at ultra-light weight and optimize ski-snow contact.

Sandwich

The ski is made in sandwich construction, in which the ski core (usually wood, rarely foam) is pressed together in the middle with overlying and underlying layers of various materials (fiberglass, fiberglass, carbon, titanal, etc.) to form a ski. Vertical sidewalls are used along the entire length of the ski. This construction guarantees optimal edge grip, balance and good power transmission.

Middle Sidewall

MIDDLE SIDEWALL construction with vertical sidewalls centered under the binding for stability and trustworthy edge grip. CAP construction at ski tip and tail for lighter turning weight and more comfortable turn initiation and exit.

Model comparison