Dynastar Speed Zone, 2018/2019

Dynastar Speed Zone 2018/19

The model series "Speed Zone" was introduced to the market in winter 2016/17 as a carving line and has since become well established. In the process, the 16 Ti model was taken out of the series. The models have been further developed and equipped with the new "Active Air Core" core, which thanks to air inclusion weighs only 370g and thus up to 17% lighter than before. Excellent edge grip has been paired with a unique glide, which is why piste skiers will have their true pleasure.

Speed Zone 14 Pro

Speed Zone 12 TI

Speed Zone 12 TI Orange

Speed Zone 10 TI

Speed Zone 9 CA

Speed Zone 7

Speed Zone 7 Red

Speed Zone 6

Speed Zone 5

Ski technologies

Tip Rocker

Moderate rocker only on the shovel. Facilitates turning with flat ski and provides softness and tolerance in the turns. The rise is moderate so that the ski works in the turn over the entire contact length of the edges.

Sandwich

The ski is made in sandwich construction and has straight sidewalls for maximum precision and performance.

100% Carbon Fiber

The Formula 1 fiber in ski construction is carbon. It has the most effective strength to weight ratio. It guarantees ultimate stability for better contact with the snow, while being the ultra-lightweight.

Titanal

Powerdrive

POWERDRIVE consists of a vertical sidewall composed of three materials: a visco-elastic component provides impact absorption on uneven terrain, the second area is made of Titanal and enhances the performance of the ski and the third part is the ABS element of the sidewall, which has a central and traditional role in ski control, stability and snow contact.

Fibro metal

Different shapes of metal and fiberglass laminates at staggered lengths in the tip provide a reduction of weight in the tip, which reduces the inertia of the shovel. This increases tip stiffness, facilitates turn initiation and ensures edge grip along the entire length of the ski. The reduced weight of the shovel ensures a faster turn.

Active Air Core

Model comparison